Latest News
-
15th May 2012
Expert urges UK businesses to outsource key projects to contractors -
14th May 2012
Demand for IT contractors with digital skills ‘explodes’ -
10th May 2012
Six months of AWR and demand for contractors still is not dented, says REC -
10th May 2012
Is another media backlash against public sector contractors in the offing? - More Atlantic News
18th July 2011
Writing on Contractor UK, Kate Cottrell said the case underlines the importance of keeping records of the differences in terms for employees and themselves.
These included a lack of fixed hours, early termination of contracts and differing holiday and payment arrangements.
Gary Hughes, who worked as engineering contractor business Marlen, recorded evidence that he worked different hours to employees at JCB, which helped him to win his case.
"For contractors, this case also highlights the care that needs to be taken when answering questions posed by HMRC," added Ms Cottrell.
"The tribunal refers several times to conflict or confusion between what is set out on paper following meetings with HMRC and what appears to have happened in reality."
Additionally, the tribunal said Mr Hughes determined how he carried out his services rather than being told what to do.
Marlen case could give contractors IR35 pointers
An IR35 case has reminded contractors of the importance of keeping records of contracts.
Writing on Contractor UK, Kate Cottrell said the case underlines the importance of keeping records of the differences in terms for employees and themselves.
These included a lack of fixed hours, early termination of contracts and differing holiday and payment arrangements.
Gary Hughes, who worked as engineering contractor business Marlen, recorded evidence that he worked different hours to employees at JCB, which helped him to win his case.
"For contractors, this case also highlights the care that needs to be taken when answering questions posed by HMRC," added Ms Cottrell.
"The tribunal refers several times to conflict or confusion between what is set out on paper following meetings with HMRC and what appears to have happened in reality."
Additionally, the tribunal said Mr Hughes determined how he carried out his services rather than being told what to do.

